Create employer account
Back to Complete Test List Create An Employer Account
  • Olivier TRINH
    BOOST SUISSE

    The service is very good and equally good is their sales-support. ExpertRating even customized their service at my requests and the turnaround time was quick. I am very pleased with ExpertRating Solutions.

  • Dima Chamma
    Roadster Diner

    Working with ExpertRating has been a pleasure. The testing solution is a wonderful service backed by excellent service. I believe we have a great partnership going on.

  • Steve Shaw
    vWriter.com, Takanomi Ltd.

    ExpertRating's API-Integrated White-Label solution is not only a great product, but they have an equally responsive team. From start to finish everything went as planned. We got going without any hiccups. Needless to say I am extremely satisfied!

  • Stephen DelVecchia, CEO and Founder
    Adaptiveprofessionals.com

    Adaptiveprofessionals.com is an online marketplace for flexible accounting and finance help that handles all phases of a temporary assignment, including the job posting, interviews, rate negotiation, timesheets, payroll and billing. The scores obtained in online skill tests powered by ExpertRating help clients and recruiters shortlist the candidates based on the performance. The skill tests are indeed an integral part of our site.

  • Guru
    Guru.com

    We’ve been offering ExpertRating’s skill tests to freelancers for the past 6 years. These tests allow freelancers to market their expertise in a quantifiable way on our site, while helping employers evaluate freelancers before hiring. ExpertRating is truly an invaluable asset to our company.

  • Michal Malafiejski, PhD., D.Sc. President & CEO
    Sphere Research Labs

    Sphere Research has been working with ExpertRating since 2009 and the association has been very fruitful helping our Sphere Engine platform to be used in new and innovative ways.

×

  • Candidate Name:

    John Doe

  • Test Pin:

    E5046444

  • Exam Name:

    3ds Max 8.0 Test

  • Date:

    Thursday, June 11, 2015

  • Score : 3
  • Percentage: 23%
  • Result : Fail

Overall Performance
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Weak
Average
Above Average
Good
Expert

Sub-scale Performance of Section 1

Sub-scale Name
Weak

(0-5)
Average

(6)
Above Average

(7)
Good

(8)
Expert

(9-10)
Animation
Sub-scale score out of 10: 2
Particles
Sub-scale score out of 10: 3
3d Modeling
Sub-scale score out of 10: 0
Materials and Texturing
Sub-scale score out of 10: 4
Rendering and Effects
Sub-scale score out of 10: 4

Efficiency:

Accuracy
Speed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Accuracy:

The candidate has obtained weak score in accuracy.

Speed:

The candidate has obtained expert score in speed.

Efficiency:

Based on the collective scores of accuracy and speed, the overall efficiency of the candidate is weak.

Strengths

  • No evident Strengths

Improvement Areas

  • Animation
  • Particles
  • 3d Modeling
  • Materials and Texturing
  • Rendering and Effects

The results of this test show that John Doe might not be best suited for jobs, which require specific focus on Animation, Particles, 3d Modeling, Materials and Texturing, Rendering and Effects.

Job Suitability

The analysis of John Doe’s performance in this test in terms of speed and accuracy with which he/ she attempted this test reveals that he/ she is weak/below average in accuracy as compared to other test takers and the time taken for completing the test was exceptionally less. If you require a candidate who is above average at understanding problems and drawing accurate inferences, and the job is time critical, then John Doe may not be shortlisted.

Disclaimer:
The results of this report are intended to serve as general guidelines only and should be used in combination with other recruitment tools such as evaluation of academic performance, employment history, and personality. The candidate’s performance on this test depends on a number of factors and ExpertRating does not guarantee same or similar results in the future or in a different test setting.
Copyright © 2024 ExpertRating Solutions.
PRODUCT
RESOURCES
COMPANY
FOLLOW
McAfee SECURE sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams
© 2024 ExpertRating LLC. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
×

  • Candidate Name:

    John Doe

  • Test Pin:

    E5046444

  • Exam Name:

    3ds Max 8.0 Test

  • Date:

    Thursday, June 11, 2015

  • Score : 3
  • Percentage: 23%
  • Result : Fail

Overall Performance
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Weak
Average
Above Average
Good
Expert

Sub-scale Performance of Section 1

Sub-scale Name
Weak

(0-5)
Average

(6)
Above Average

(7)
Good

(8)
Expert

(9-10)
Animation
Sub-scale score out of 10: 2
Particles
Sub-scale score out of 10: 3
3d Modeling
Sub-scale score out of 10: 0
Materials and Texturing
Sub-scale score out of 10: 4
Rendering and Effects
Sub-scale score out of 10: 4

Efficiency:

Accuracy
Speed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Accuracy:

The candidate has obtained weak score in accuracy.

Speed:

The candidate has obtained expert score in speed.

Efficiency:

Based on the collective scores of accuracy and speed, the overall efficiency of the candidate is weak.

Strengths

  • No evident Strengths

Improvement Areas

  • Animation
  • Particles
  • 3d Modeling
  • Materials and Texturing
  • Rendering and Effects

The results of this test show that John Doe might not be best suited for jobs, which require specific focus on Animation, Particles, 3d Modeling, Materials and Texturing, Rendering and Effects.

Job Suitability

The analysis of John Doe’s performance in this test in terms of speed and accuracy with which he/ she attempted this test reveals that he/ she is weak/below average in accuracy as compared to other test takers and the time taken for completing the test was exceptionally less. If you require a candidate who is above average at understanding problems and drawing accurate inferences, and the job is time critical, then John Doe may not be shortlisted.

Disclaimer:
The results of this report are intended to serve as general guidelines only and should be used in combination with other recruitment tools such as evaluation of academic performance, employment history, and personality. The candidate’s performance on this test depends on a number of factors and ExpertRating does not guarantee same or similar results in the future or in a different test setting.
Copyright © 2015 ExpertRating Solutions.